FB Pixel
Onboarding Hub (Participants Only)

DAO Summary Report Templates

Estimated reading: 5 minutes 17 views

At the end of DEP Cohort 2, each DAO submits a DAO Summary Report that documents its activities, learnings, outcomes, and regeneration achievements.

The report serves three main purposes:

  1. Document & reflect on the DAO’s contributions 
  2. Share impact with partners, sponsors, and stakeholders 
  3. Prepare continuity for future cohorts (Cohort 3 and beyond) 

This page provides the official templates for DAO Report submission.

All DAOs must follow the structure below.

1. DAO Summary Report - Full Template

(Submitted by DAO Lead, with input from all Working Groups)

Below is the standardized structure.

A. Overview & DAO Profile

  1. DAO Name 
  2. DAO Theme / Domain 
  3. DAO Vision (1–2 sentences) 
  4. Summary of Master Plan 
  5. Total Members (and roles) 
    • DAO Lead 
    • WG Leads 
    • DAO Facilitator (Kambria) 
    • Members per WG 
    • Internal/External Ambassadors (if any) 
  6. DAO Duration (Mid-May → July 2025) 

B. Master Plan Overview (from approved MP Proposal)

  • Final Master Plan goals (Impact + Regeneration) 
  • Working Groups formed 
  • Key milestones originally planned 

Provide a short, high-level summary (not the full proposal; max 1 page).

C. Activities & Deliverables

C1. Activities Completed

For each WG and cross-DAO activity:

  • Title of activity 
  • Date(s) 
  • Description 
  • Participants involved 
  • Partner involvement (if any) 
  • Links to materials, posts, or outputs 

C2. Deliverables Completed

List concrete outputs, such as:

  • Creative works 
  • Workshops 
  • CED sessions (Exchange DAO) 
  • Green activities (Local Green Economy DAO) 
  • Tokenomics research outputs 
  • Documentation, templates, prototypes 
  • Community posts, reports, stories 

Attach or link to files as needed.

D. Impact Measurement (Required)

D1. Impact Goals vs. Achievements

Based on the DAO’s MP Proposal:

Impact Goal Target Achieved Evidence

Examples (varies by DAO):

  • of creative works completed 
  • of Exchange sessions held 
  • of community participants engaged 
  • of green actions completed 
  • of cross-cultural conversations 

D2. Impact Stories (Qualitative)

Short stories demonstrating impact on:

  • DAO members 
  • Community participants 
  • Partners 
  • Families or local communities 
  • Youth development, learning, creativity, cultural understanding 

E. Regeneration Outcomes (Required)

E1. Regeneration Goal Fulfillment

| Regeneration Goal | Target | Achieved | Evidence |

Examples:

  • Funds/materials brought into the ecosystem 
  • Sponsorship supported 
  • Venue support 
  • Tools/resources donated 
  • Community participation driven 
  • Partner collaborations initiated 

E2. Regeneration Learnings

What worked / What didn’t / What’s recommended for next cohort.

F. Working Group Summaries

Each WG submits a 1-page summary (template below). DAO Lead compiles.

WG Summary includes:

  • WG Name 
  • WG Lead 
  • Members 
  • Responsibilities 
  • Activities completed 
  • Key deliverables 
  • Challenges faced 
  • Learnings 
  • Recommendations for next cycle 

(Full template provided later in Section 2.)

G. Collaboration & Partners

List all organizations involved:

| Partner Name | Type (Community / Knowledge / Collaboration / Sponsor / Regeneration) | Contribution | Evidence / Link |

Include:

  • Workshops 
  • Co-created activities 
  • Promotion 
  • Sponsorship 
  • Expert sessions 

H. KAT Recognition Summary (DAO-Level)

This summarizes the KAT categories the DAO utilized, e.g.:

  • Execution Contribution 
  • Creative Contribution 
  • Regeneration Contribution 
  • Community Contribution 
  • Knowledge Sharing 
  • Operations & Coordination 

The DAO Lead does not assign KAT amounts here; they simply note:

  • Which categories were used 
  • How contributions were evaluated 
  • Whether the KAT Tokenomics DAO guidance was applied 

(Actual individual allocation happens separately.)

I. Challenges & Reflections

  • What challenges did the DAO face? 
  • What helped overcome them? 
  • What can be improved for Cohort 3? 
  • What new opportunities emerged from this DAO’s work? 

Reflection should be honest, constructive, and future-oriented.

J. Recommendations for Future Cohorts (Required)

Minimum 5 clear, actionable recommendations covering:

  • DAO structure 
  • Working methods 
  • Partner engagement 
  • Regeneration strategy 
  • KAT recognition model 
  • Member onboarding or alignment 

K. Final Statement

A short closing message on:

  • What the DAO has achieved 
  • What the DAO hopes future cohorts will build upon 
  • Acknowledgements 

2. Working Group Summary Template

(Submitted by each WG Lead)

A one-page summary using the template below:

A. Working Group Profile

  1. WG Name 
  2. WG Lead 
  3. Members 
  4. Scope (as defined in MP Proposal) 

B. Activities Completed

For each activity:

  • Title 
  • Description 
  • Date 
  • Members involved 
  • Relevant partner contributions 
  • Output(s) produced 

C. Deliverables Completed

List all WG-specific deliverables:

  • Creative works 
  • Session outlines 
  • Research summaries 
  • Templates or tools 
  • Documentation 
  • Prototypes 
  • Media artifacts 

D. Achievements Toward Impact Goals

| Goal | WG Contribution | Evidence |

E. Achievements Toward Regeneration Goals

| Goal | WG Contribution | Evidence |

F. Challenges & Learnings

  • Challenges faced 
  • Adaptations made 
  • What worked well 
  • What WG recommends for next cohort 

G. Recommendations for Cohort 3

Three actionable suggestions.

3. Submission Format & Requirements

DAOs must submit:

✔ 1 Full DAO Summary Report (compiled by DAO Lead)

✔ 1 Summary Report per Working Group

✔ Evidence links (Google Drive, folders, or embedded links)

✔ Final outputs (artworks, session materials, research docs, etc.)

✔ Screenshots for posts or partner activities (when applicable)

All reports should follow the provided structure and maintain:

  • Clear writing 
  • Concise documentation 
  • Accurate evidence attribution 
  • Respectful tone 
  • No personal data unless consent is granted 

4. Purpose of These Templates

These templates are designed to:

  • Ensure consistency across DAOs 
  • Simplify evaluation for Kambria, partners, and cohort reviewers 
  • Create sharable documentation for future cohorts 
  • Facilitate recognition (certificates, KAT, partnerships) 
  • Preserve institutional knowledge for long-term ecosystem growth